NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lieschke v Lieschke [2003] NSWSC 743 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 August 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Declaration that the cross-claimant holds the balance of proceeds of sale for himself absolutely
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - equitable estoppel - son claims interest in farming land through improvements made in reliance on father's statement - ingredients of estoppel - reliance and detriment Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Selfserve Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Dillwyn v LLewelyn (1862) 4 De GF & J 517 Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210 Giumelli v Giumelli (1989) 196 CLR 101 CASES CITED : Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 Milchas Investments Pty Ltd v Larkin (1989) 96 FLR 464 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 Riches v Hogben [1985] 2 Qd R 292 Silovi Pty Ltd v Barbaro (1988) 13 NSWLR 466 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1998) 164 CLR 387 Wykes v Samilk Pty Ltd [1998] Aust Contract R 90-097 PARTIES : Desmond John Lieschke and Pamela Jean McEvoy (P/XD) Lester Ferdinand Lieschke (D/XC) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6124/01 COUNSEL : P T Taylor (P/XD) L J Ellison (D/XC) SOLICITORS : Marshall Sheehan & Associates, Albury (P/XD) Harris Lieberman Boyd, Albury (D/XC)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
AUSTIN J
TUESDAY 12 AUGUST 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate