NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SMEC HOLDINGS LIMITED & ORS v BONIFACE [2003] NSWSC 555 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : 1. I grant the plaintiffs leave to file an amended statement of claim only in accordance with these reasons. Otherwise, the plaintiffs have not been granted leave to plead fresh matters.; 2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs.; 3. The matter is placed in the Registrar's Defamation Directions List on 11 July 2003.
CATCHWORDS : Imputations - corporation - capacity - difference in substance CASES CITED : Armitage v Double Bay Newspapers Pty Ltd (NSWSC, unreported, 26 September 1991) Greek Herald v Nikolopoulos (2002) 54 NSWLR 165 SMEC HOLDINGS LIMITED (ABN 84 057 274 049) (First plaintiff)
PETER BUSBRIDGE (Second plaintiff)
ROSS HITT PARTIES : (Third plaintiff)
GEOFF PERCIVAL (Fourth plaintiff)
v
GLEN BONIFACE (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 21012 OF 2001 M Neil QC / D Caspersonn (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : C Evatt / M Rolinson (Defendant) Baker & McKenzie (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : S Moran & Co (Defendant)
[2003] NSWSC 555 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate