NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Preece v Boyd & McDougall [2003] NSWSC 172 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/3/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 March 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Appeal against Magistrate's decision - powers of Special Constable to require information under Roads Act 1993 - presumption against requiring information that may incriminate - meaning of "immediately" - arrest, whether words enough - resisting arrest Justices Act 1902 LEGISLATION CITED : Roads Act 1993 Police (Special Provisions) Act 1901 Ballesty & Anor v Director of Liquor and Gaming & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1102 R v Francis (1735) Lee temp. Hard. 113 Thompson v Gibson 10 LJ Ex 243 Wightman v Land Boad of Canterbury & Quirk (1912) 31 NZLR 799 Cross v McHugh [1974] 1 NSWLR 500 Sorby v The Commonwealth of Australia (1983) 152 CLR 281 CASES CITED : Police Service Board v Morris (1984-1985) 156 CLR 397 Alderson v Booth [1969] 2 QB 216 Woodley v Boyd [2001] NSWCA 35 R v Galvin (No 2) [1961] VR 740 R v Appelby (1940) 28 Cr App R 1 O'Hair v Killian [1971] 1 SASR 1 Cavanagh v Galkowski [1979] 20 SASR 322 Police v Thomson [1969] NZLR 513 Mark Thomas Preece (Pl/Resp) Michael Boyd (Def/Appl) PARTIES : Mark Thomas Preece (Pl/Resp) Stuart Gregory McDougall (Def/Appl) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12108/01; 12109/01 COUNSEL : R Horsley (Pl/Resp) T Bates (Defs/Appls) Harris Wheeler (Pl/Resp) SOLICITORS : Boyd Wooi Olsen (Boyd - Def/Appl) Mark Evans (McDougall - Def/Appl)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate