NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Lebler [2003] NSWCCA 362 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher ACJ at 1; Kirby J at 2; Shaw J at 106 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Practice & Procedure - inconsistent verdicts - unreasonableness of verdict - use of doubt on one count when resolving issues on other counts - pressure on jury to reach verdict - recklessness in context of consent to sexual intercourse - directions on complaint evidence cf accused's denials Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v R (2002) 193 ALR 184 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 R v Crisologo (1997) 99 A Crim R 178 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82 CASES CITED : Regina v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174 R v Colville [2003] NSWCCA 23 R v Kitchener (1993) 29 NSWLR 696 R v Tolmie (1995) 37 NSWLR 660 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 Kilby v The Queen (1973) 129 CLR 460 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 PARTIES : Regina Natalis Andre Lebler FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60295/03 COUNSEL : P M Miller (Crown) P Hamill (Appellant) SOLICITORS : C K Smith (Crown) S O'Connor (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate