NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Yeshiva Properties No. 1 Pty Limited & Ors v Lubavitch Mazal Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 778 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/08/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 August 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Hearing dates for motion for contempt vacated.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Alleged contemnor unable to furnish instructions or to attend on hearing of motion for contempt LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act CASES CITED : Attorney General v Times Newspapers Limited 1973 Vol 3 All ER 54 Yeshiva Properties No 1 Pty Ltd v Lubavitch Mazal Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 615. Lubavitch Mazal Pty Limited (Applicant) Yeshiva Properties No. 1 Pty Limited Yeshiva Properties No. 2 Pty Limited PARTIES : Yeshiva Properties No. 3 Pty Limited Yeshiva Properties No. 4 Pty Limited Yeshiva Properties No. 5 Pty Limited Yeshiva Properties No. 6 Pty Limited Pinchus Feldman (Respondents) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5361/02 CRC Newlinds (Applicant) COUNSEL : SJ Burchett (Pinchus Feldman) No appearance for Yeshiva Properties Companies Schetzer Brott & Appel (Melbourne), Kemp Strang (Agent) (Applicant) SOLICITORS : McCabe Terrill Lawyers (Pinchus Feldman) No appearance for Yeshiva Properties Companies
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
Einstein J
Wednesday 20 August 2003 ex tempore Revised 25 August 2003
5361/02 Yeshiva Properties No 1. Pty Ltd & Ors v Lubavitch Mazal Pty Ltd JUDGMENT The Proceedings 1 Proceedings SC 5361/02 were determined by Young CJ in Eq by Judgment dated 8 July 2003 Yeshiva Properties No 1 Pty Ltd v Lubavitch Mazal Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 615. 2 The essential background may be seen in the short outline given in the judgment in paragraphs 2 to 4:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate