NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Boral Timber v Lindquist [2004] NSWSC 341 revised - 30/04/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 April 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The application for leave under s 208M of the Act is refused; (3) The decisions of the costs assessor dated 25 July 2002 and the review panel dated 5 November 2002 are affirmed; (4) The summons is dismissed; (5) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal determination of Cost Review Panel - Appeal determination of Costs Assessor Compensation Court Rules 1990 (NSW) (now repleaded) LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) - s 208M Legal Professional Regulation 1994 (NSW) CDJ v VAJ (No 1) (1998) 197 CLR 172 Chapmans Ltd v Yandell (t/as Yandells) [1999] NSWCA 361 Coulter v Regina (1988) 164 CLR 350 CASES CITED : Landwell (Vic) Pty Ltd v Neessen Investments Pty Ltd (unreported, NSWSC 16 September 1996, Young J) Morgan v Banning (1999) 20 WAR 474 Larsen v Vile [1999] NSWCA 397 State of Tasmania v Beadle (2001) 10 Tas R 302 Warner v Sampson [1959] 1 QB 297 Boral Timber Industries Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Tony Brian Lindquist (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13301/2002 Mr R Smith (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr C Taylor (Defendant) Abbott Tout (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Savage Lawyers Orange (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate