NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Skalkos v Smiles & Ors [2003] NSWSC 101 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 February 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass DECISION : I confirm the decision and dismiss the present application. Kotsakis is to pay the costs of the Notice of Motion filed on 15 October 2002. The Exhibit may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Review - discretionary power - relevant considerations. LEGISLATION CITED : Bankruptcy Act 1966, s 82, Pt X. John Skalkos (Plaintiff) v James John Smiles (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Fifth Cross-Defendant) Archibold George Poulos (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) PARTIES : Smiles Poulos Services Pty Limited (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) Taxcare Pty Limited (Fourth Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) Svelte Corporation Pty Limited (Fifth Defendant) Geoff Kotsakis (Sixth Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Fifth Cross-Claimant) FAI General Insurance Company Limited (Fourth Cross-Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 21033 of 1995 N/A (Plaintiff) Mr M R Aldridge SC (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Fifth Cross-Defendant) N/A (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) COUNSEL : N/A (Fourth Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Fifth Defendant) Mr R J Bromwich (Sixth Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Proposed Fifth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Fourth Cross-Defendant) N/A (Plaintiff) Eric F Abreu (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Fifth Cross-Defendant) N/A (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) SOLICITORS : N/A (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Fourth Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant/Third Cross-Claimant/Fourth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Fifth Defendant) Heaney, Richardson & Nemes (Sixth Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant/Proposed Fifth Cross-Claimant) N/A (Fourth Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate