NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Timms v Commonwealth Bank; Commonwealth Bank v Timms [2003] NSWSC 576 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/06/03, 18/06/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Documents admitted into evidence
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - company financial statements and drafts thereof - whether prepared for purpose of, in connection with or in contemplation of proceedings - relevance of statutory provisions requiring financial statements to be prepared - whether defendant will suffer unfair preuudice if documents admitted when directors and accountant will be available for cross-examination - overriding effect of s.1305, Corporations Act LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s.1305 Evidence Act 1995, ss.69, 135 Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1083 CASES CITED : Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd v Arthur Yates & Co Ltd [2003] NSWSC 281 R v Turner [2002] TASSC 18 Anastasia Timms - First Plaintiff Brian Timms - Second Plaintiff PARTIES : T W Holdings Pty Limited - Third Plaintiff BDA International Pty Limited - Fourth Plaintiff Commonswealth Bank of Australia - First Defendant Leslie Ludovic Rosenfeld and Alfred Kant t/as Rosenfeld, Kant & Co - Third Defendants FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2644/94; 3054/97 Mr A J Sullivan QC/Mr M Clarke - Plaintiffs COUNSEL : Mr R G Forster SC/Mr N Manousaridis - First Defendant Mr R E Dubler - Third Defendants Browne & Co - Plaintiffs SOLICITORS : L E Taylor - First Defendant Phillips Fox - Third Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate