NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Baleisuva [2004] NSWCCA 344 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Barr J at 2; Hoeben J at 3 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed.
CATCHWORDS : Failure to identify co-offenders - relevance to contrition and rehabilitation, appropriateness of questions by sentencing judge. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Chow v DPP (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 CASES CITED : R v Fajka [2004] NSWCCA 166 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 PARTIES : Alfred William Baleisuva - Applicant Crown - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1870 COUNSEL : A P Cook - Applicant Ms J Girdham - Crown SOLICITORS : S O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/11/0700 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dodd DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/1870
DUNFORD J BARR J HOEBEN J
Wednesday, 13 October, 2004 REGINA v Alfred BALEISUVA Judgment 1 DUNFORD: I agree with Hoeben J. 2 BARR J: I agree with Hoeben J. 3 HOEBEN J: On 22 July 2003 at the Downing Centre Local Court the applicant pleaded guilty to the following offence for which he was committed for sentence to the Sydney District Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate