NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Howe v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & ors [2003] NSWSC 157 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 March 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J DECISION : Summons dismissed
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - procedural fairness - Disciplinary Tribunal - complaint established - need to receive further submissions on penalty - apprehended bias LEGISLATION CITED : Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986, s 26(1)(c) & (e) Hall v New South Wales Trotting Club Limited [1977] 1 NSWLR 378 Malone v Marr [1981] 2 NSWLR 894 CASES CITED : Re JRL ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 Re Watson ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17, 205 CLR 507 Peter Allan Howe (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales (First Defendant) The Registrar of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10516/03 COUNSEL : A Stenmark SC (Plaintiff) M Wade - solicitor (Third Defendant) PME Robinson & Co, Lawyers (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : IV Knight, Crown Solicitor (First & Second Defendants) - submitting appearance Tress Cocks & Maddox (Third Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate