NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Iovanescu v McDermott [2004] NSWCA 106 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Young CJ in Eq at 2; Windeyer J at 8 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed
CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTION - extension of time - exercise of discretion by court - claim for extension of time to seek rescission of dismissal of case involving extensive delays - no adequate explanation for delay - appeal from District Court allowed LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Rules Pt 1, r5 Pt 3 r1, Pt 3 r2, Pt12 r4C, Pt26, r4B Suitors Fund Act 1951 Falconer v Laird [2003] NSWCA 114 CASES CITED : Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 State of Queensland & anor v J L Holdings Pty Limited (1997) 189 CLR 146 PARTIES : Teodore Iovanescu (Appellant) Stephen McDermott (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA CA 40570 OF 2003 COUNSEL : Mr P J Deakin QC with him Mr M Vesper (Appellant) Mr P J Doherty SC with him Mr R Grace (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Sparke Helmore (Appellant) Maurice May & Co (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 4827 of 1993 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nicholson DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 8 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40570/03
SHELLER JA, YOUNG CJ in Eq WINDEYER J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate