NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Andrew William Godfrey (by his tutor Carol Ruth Godfrey) and Carol Ruth Godfrey v New South Wales (No 1) [2003] NSWSC 160 revised - 18/03/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/3/03, 11/3/03, 12/3/03, 13/3/03, 14/3/03, 15/3/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J DECISION : Evidence admitted
CATCHWORDS : Evidence - expert opinion evidence -experience LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 76, 79, 80 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Limited (Unreported, FCA, 31 July 2002); Clarke v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486; HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414; Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited (Unreported, NSWSC, 9 November 2001); Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; CASES CITED : R v Barker (1988) 34 A Crim R 141; R v Silverlock (1894) 2 QB 766; R v Yildiz (1983) 11 A Crim R 115; Sydneywide Distributors Pty Limited v Red Bull Australia Pty Limited [2002] FCAFC 157; Weal v Bottom (1966) 40 ALJR 436; Velevski v The Queen (2002) 76 ALJR 402 Andrew William Godfrey -Plaintiff PARTIES : Carol Ruth Godfrey - Plaintiff The State of New South Wales - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20344/00; 20345/00 COUNSEL : B Gross, QC with D Williams - Plantiffs J Sexton, SC with D Kell - Defendant SOLICITORS : Carroll and O'Dea - Plaintiffs Crown Solicitor - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate