NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v BANIC [2004] NSWCCA 322 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Barr J at 2; Hoeben J at 33 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismssed; Leave granted to appeal against sentence and appeal dismissed.
PARTIES : Regina v Radovan BANIC FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1809 CCA COUNSEL : Appellant: J Conomos Respondent: D Woodburne SOLICITORS : Appellant: Tsambas & Co Respondent: S Kavanagh
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/11/0744 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nield DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 11 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/1809 (60290/04)
SPIGELMAN CJ BARR J HOEBEN J
23 September 2004 REGINA v Radovan BANIC Judgment 1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I agree with Barr J.
2 BARR J: This is an appeal against a conviction entered up in the District Court and an application for leave to appeal against the resulting sentence. On 27 October 2003 the appellant stood trial before a jury on a charge of suppling the prohibited drug methylamphetamine and on a charge of supplying the prohibited drug 3, 4 methylenedioxymethylamphetamine. The latter drug is known as ecstasy. The jury found the appellant guilty on both counts. The trial judge, Nield DCJ, sentenced the appellant for each offence to imprisonment for four years with a non-parole period of three years.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate