NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SHARON Y EUBANKS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v NICHOLAS BASIL CANNAR AND BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (INVESTMENTS) LIMITED [2003] NSWSC 1267 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1 DECISION : See paragraph 52 of judgment
Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence On Commission Act 1995 Supreme Court Act 1970 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Lenning v Alexander Proudfoot Company World Headquarters (unreported) NSW CA 22 April 1991 Magnusson v ACT Health & Community Care Service [2001] ACTSC 3 CASES CITED : Re Western Canada Oil, Lands and Works Company (1877) 6 Ch D 109 Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 United States of America v Phillip Morris [2003] All ER (191) DEC SHARON Y EUBANKS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - (Respondent) PARTIES : NICHOLAS BASIL CANNAR - (Applicant) BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (INVESTMENTS) LIMITED FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13177/02 Dr Bell (Respondent - Ms Eubanks) COUNSEL : Mr Gageler SC / Mr Speakman / Ms Richardson (Applicant - Mr Cannar) Mr S Finch SC (Batco) Ebsworth & Ebsworth (Respondent - Ms Eubanks) SOLICITORS : Gilbert & Tobin (Applicant - Mr Cannar) Baker & McKenzie (Batco)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BELL J
Friday 19 December 2003
13177/02 SHARON Y EUBANKS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v NICHOLAS BASIL CANNAR AND BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (INVESTMENTS) LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate