NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : TURNBULL v. ALM & ANOR [2004] NSWCA 173 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/06/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Tobias JA at 2; Bryson JA at 3 DECISION : Dismiss appeal by Occupier against Entrant: allow cross-appeals so as to award 50% contribution against City Council; See para [79]
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - Occupier's Liability - footpath on private land outside shops at periphery of shopping area - Occupier landlord leased out shops and retained Common Areas including footpath - plaintiff using footpath while shopping after dark tripped and fell in hole 4" wide 6" long 1" deep in otherwise regular concrete footpath - Trial Judge wrongly applied test requiring Occupier to ensure safety - liability reconsidered on facts - challenges to factual findings of Trial Judge considered - City Council repaired footpath inadequately several times - Occupier took no action to repair - negligence found against both and apportioned 50%-50%. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 s.54 Tame v. State of New South Wales; Annetts v. Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317 Cafest Holdings Pty Ltd v. Tombleson [2003] NSWCA 210 Australian Safeway Stores Ltd v. Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 Phillis v. Daly (1988) 15 NSWLR 65 CASES CITED : Wyong Shire Council v. Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Waverley Municipal Council v. Swain [2003] NSWCA 61 David Jones Ltd v. Bates [2001] NSWCA 233 Richmond Valley Council v. Standing [2002] NSWCA 359 Brodie v. Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v. Hawkesbury Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 Gai Lynette Turnbull - Appellant PARTIES : Gillian Thesere Alm - Respondent/Cross-Appellant The Council of the City of Dubbo - Cross-Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40911/2003 J. Maconachie QC and P. Perry - Appellant COUNSEL : L. King SC and P. Regattieri - Respondent/Cross-Appellant P. Arden SC and R. Anthony - Cross-Respondent Ebsworth & Ebsworth - Appellant SOLICITORS : Peacocke, Dickens & Price - Respondent/Cross-Appellant Leitch Hasson Dent - Cross-Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate