NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Manfred Schoenhoff & Evelyn Schoenhoff v The Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2004] NSWCA 161 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/5/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Stein AJA at 3 DECISION : Appeal be dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : Appellant was guarantor for borrower of funds from respondent- whether guarantee discharged by advance made by respondent to borrower- whether indemnity suffered the same fate- whether advance contrary to terms of facility for which guarantee provided Ankar Pty Ltd v National Westminster Finance (Aust) Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 549 CASES CITED : Bond v Hong Kong Bank of Australia Ltd [1991] 25 NSWLR 286 Duncombe v ANZ Bank Ltd [1970] Qd R 202 Manfred Schoenhoff- First Appellant PARTIES : Evelyn Schoenhoff- Second Appellant The Commonwealth Bank of Australia: Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41032/03 COUNSEL : N. Perram/ N Bilinksy for the Appellants M. McCullock/ A Abadee for the Respondent SOLICITORS : Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe for the Appellants J.K. O'Sullivan for the Respondent
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Equity Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT SC 50193/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Einstein J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41032/03 DC 50193/02
IPP JA McCOLL JA STEIN AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate