NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : White v Arizon Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1051 HEARING DATE(S) : 6/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 November 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq DECISION : Judgment for the cross-claimant. Plaintiff's summons dismissed. Plaintiff to pay costs of the summons and of the cross-claim.
CATCHWORDS : WILLS [230]- Construction- Testatrix granted plaintiff permission to occupy- Whether a life-estate interest in the property- Mere right of residence is not an estate- Failure to perform the conditions attached to right- Trustee validly terminated plaintiff's right to occupy- Plaintiff was granted a joint right of residence with her sister, thus both of them required to be a party to the suit for it to succeed- Facts supported finding that plaintiff had ceased to occupy the premises. LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900, s 74L Supreme Court Rules Part 8(3) Ellison v O'Neill (1968) 88 WN (NSW) (Pt 1) 213 Gill v Gill (1921) 21 SR (NSW) 400 CASES CITED : Perpetual Trustees (WA) Ltd v Darvell [2001] WASC 123 Re Gibbons [1920] 1 Ch 372 Re Keenan (1913) 30 WN (NSW) 214 Stevenson v Myers (1929) 47 WN (NSW) 94 PARTIES : Isobelle Victoria White (P) Arizon Pty Limited (D) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5279/03 COUNSEL : W Washington (P) A Lakeman (D) SOLICITORS : Turnbull Bowles Lawyers Pty Limited (P) David Roe (D)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
YOUNG CJ in EQ
Thursday 6 November 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate