NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/06/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1; Howie J at 2; Hislop J at 52 DECISION : Application for leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Sentencing - relevance of matters of aggravation and mitigation under s 21A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act - Appeal - fresh evidence on sentence appeal. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 - s 66F(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 21A R v Kier [2004] NSWCCA 106 R v L (NSWCCA, unreported, 17 June 1996) R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 CASES CITED : R v Santamaria (2001) 126 A Crim R 99 Wise v R [1965] Tas SR 196 R v Boyd [1975] VR 168 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Ashton (2002) 137 A Crim R 73 PARTIES : Regina v Sydney Wickham FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60017/04 COUNSEL : G. Rowling - Crown H. Cox - Applicant SOLICITORS : S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/51/0091 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ducker DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60017/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate