NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : HODGE v TCN CHANNEL NINE PTY LTD [2003] NSWSC 1075 revised - 25/02/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 20 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : 1. If the plaintiff is to exercise the leave to amend, he should do so by 5.00 pm on Monday 24 November.; 2. The defendant is, by 4.00 pm on Friday 28 November, to file its defence, limited to the issues to be determined by the Jury pursuant to s 7A of the Defamation Act, pursuant to Part 31 Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules.; 3. I direct a trial by Jury of the issues as joined between the parties.; 4. In relation to the first application, I confirm that I have ordered expedition. I grant leave to the parties forthwith to make arrangements to approach Bell J, the List Judge, to obtain a hearing date for the 7A trial.; 5. In relation to the imputations argument, the plaintiff has been predominantly successful and I order the defendant to pay its costs in that regard.; 6. In relation to the expedition application, I order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs thereof.
CATCHWORDS : Imputations - capacity - form GREGORY HODGE (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
TCN CHANNEL NINE PTY LTD (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20276 of 2003 B Connel / T Jowett (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : T Blackburn SC / S Dawson (Defendant) Blake Dawson Waldron (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Gilbert & Tobin (Defendant)
Ex tempore: revised [2003] NSWSC 1075 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate