NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Matthews; R v Williams [2004] NSWCCA 259 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J at 1; Sperling J at 81; Bergin J at 83 DECISION : In each case, appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : jointly committed offences - supply of not less than the commercial quantity of cannabis leaf - supply of not less than the traffickable quantity of methylamphetamine - whether each of the appellants knew of the existence of cannabis in the trailer - directions to jury as to appellants' knowledge of the cannabis - direction to jury on tendency or coincidence reasoning - direction to the jury concerning possession - unreasonable verdicts Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s47A LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s25, s29, Evidence Act 1995 s97, s98 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 KRM v The Queen [2001] HCA 11; 206 CLR 221 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Anderson (unreported) NSWCCA, 15 December 1983 CASES CITED : R v Bazley (unreported) NSWCCA, 23 March 1989 R v Burns (unreported), NSWCCA, 19 August 1988 R v Duong [2003] NSWCCA 55, unreported, 10 March 2003 R v Filippetti (1978) 13 A Crim R 335 The Queen v Myall (1986) 43 SASR 258 Crown - Respondent PARTIES : Rodney James Matthews - Appellant Sahrita May Williams - Appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60409/03; 60408/03 COUNSEL : D Woodburne - Crown P Boulten SC - Appellants SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown J Bettens - Appellants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate