NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : R.E. Batger Pty. Ltd. v. Khayat [2004] NSWCA 276 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Pearlman AJA at 43 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Verdict and judgment below set aside, and in lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the appellant, the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings. 3. Respondent to pay appellant's costs of appeal, and to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise entitled.
CATCHWORDS : WORKERS' COMPENSATION - Common law damages - Appeal - Whether adequate reasons given for accepting plaintiff's evidence over contrary evidence on behalf of defendant - Whether adequate reasons for finding unsafe system of work - Whether thresholds for damages passed. PARTIES : R.E. Batger Pty. Ltd. - appellant Amer Khayat - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40999/03 COUNSEL : Mr. G. Watson SC with Mr. D. Wilkins for appellant Mr. M. Cranitch SC with Mr. R.F. Wilkins for respondent SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt, Sydney for appellant Max Emanual, Wentworth Falls for respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 145/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Graham DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40999/03 DC 145/01
GILES JA HODGSON JA PEARLMAN AJA
Monday 16 August 2004 R.E. BATGER PTY. LTD. V. KHAYAT Judgment 1 GILES JA: I agree with Hodgson JA. 2 HODGSON JA: On 27 July 2003, Graham DCJ gave judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $235,342.52 in proceedings in which the respondent had sued the appellant his employer in respect of a work place injury. The appellant appeals to this Court from that judgment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate