NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Harrison v Lau Nay Nominees P/L t/as Abs Transport [2004] NSWCA 18 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 February 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Ipp JA at 18; McColl JA at 33 DECISION : 1. Appeal against first respondent dismissed with costs (3:0). 2. Appeal against second respondent, by majority, dismissed with costs (2:1).
CATCHWORDS : APPEAL - TORT - NEGLIGENCE - PERSONAL INJURY - COMPENSATION - Appeal against two respondents from a District Court decision (in favour of three defendants) - whether transport company employer is liable for injury to its employee arising at their customers' freight pick-up sites and loadings - whether employer, or the employer's customers, are liable for injuries arising from the truck driver employee's assumption of risk in loading truck - why the third defendant was not joined as a third respondent to the appeal. Held: Employer/first respondent not liable by virtue of an employer/employee relationship alone - by majority: (a) although the second respondent did act carelessly, it did not breach any duty of care owed to the appellant - (b) appellant acquiesced to second respondent's carelessness - appeal against both respondents dismissed with costs. CASES CITED : Pro-Krane Pty Ltd v Nobbs (Nov. 1996, BC 9605515) McLean v Tedman (1984) 155 CLR 306 at 311 John Harrison PARTIES : v Lau Nay Nominees Pty Limited t/as ABS Transport & 2 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40037 of 2003 A: G R Petty SC & B McManamey COUNSEL : 1R: G Little SC & P O'Connor 2R: J Hislop QC & D S Weinberger A: Maurice Blackburn Cashman SOLICITORS : 1R: A O Ellison 2R: Dexter Healey
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate