NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 150 A Crim R 299
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Cicekdag [2004] NSWCCA 357 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Grove J at 1; James J at 9; Hoeben J at 10 DECISION : Crown appeal allowed - respondent resentenced.
CATCHWORDS : Crown appeal - inadequacy of sentences, use of Form 1 matters, offences committed while subject to community service order, special circumstances, delay in sentencing. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Attorney-Genmeral's application under s37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Mill v The Queen (1998) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Bavadra [2000] NSWCCA 292 R v Camilleri (NSWCCA, unreported, 8.2.90) R v Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 CASES CITED : R v Hammoud (2000) 118 ACrimR 66 R v Jones (CCA, unreported, 30.6.94) R v KM & Ors [2004] NSWCCA 65 R v Richards (1981) 2 NSWLR 464 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 109 R v Vranic (unreported NSWCCA 7.5.91) R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 R v WM [2004] NSWCCA 53 PARTIES : Crown - Applicant Ayhan Cicekdag - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1862 COUNSEL : Dr P Power SC - Crown A Cook - Respondent SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown S O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate