NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Lee Joshua Martin [2004] NSWCCA 416 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Hislop J at 2; Smart AJ at 31 DECISION : 1. Leave to appeal granted.; 2. Appeal allowed.; 3. Sentence of imprisonment for 5 years and 4 months to commence on 14 June 2003 confirmed.; 4. The non-parole period of 4 years is quashed. In lieu thereof, non-parole period of 3 years 3 months commencing on 14 June 2003 and expiring on 13 September 2006 substituted.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Sentencing - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act s 44 - Discount for utilitarian value of plea - Reduction of non-parole period LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 CASES CITED : R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Dib [2003] NSWCCA 117 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 PARTIES : Lee Joshua Martin - Applicant Regina - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1825 CCAP COUNSEL : Ms L Flannery - Applicant Mr D C Frearson SC - Crown SOLICITORS : S O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/11/1007 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nield DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2004/1825 CCAP WOOD CJ at CL HISLOP J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate