NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wendt v Northwood [2004] NSWSC 23 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/09/03, 23/09/03, 24/09/03, 10/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J at 1 DECISION : 1) The plaintiff's claim for equitable damages for breach of fiduciary duty does not succeed;; 2) The plaintiff's claim for improper profit arising from a breach of fiduciary obligations does not succeed;; 3) The plaintiff's claim under s42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) does not succeed;; 4) The plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : fiduciary obligations - solicitor/client relationship - continuing relationships - duty of disclosure - conflict of interest - improper profit - s42 Fair Trading Act, misleading and deceptive conduct LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), ss42, 68 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s126 Allison v Clayhills (1907) 97 LT 709; Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy (1999) 48 NSWLR 1; Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46; Breen v Williams (1998) 186 CLR 71; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1928) 60 CLR 336; Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178; Clarke Boyce v Mouat (1994) 1 AC 428; Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 373 ; Farrington v Rowe McBride & Partners [1985] 1 NZLR 83; Heydon v NRMA Ltd (2000) 51 NSWLR 1; Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; Jordy v Vanderplump (1920) 64 SJ 324 (Ch); CASES CITED : Keith Henry & Co Pty Ltd v Stuart Walker & Co Pty Ltd (1958) 100 CLR 342; Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449; McMaster v Byrne [1952] 1 All ER 1362; Morris v Hanley (2003) 173 FLR 83; Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932; Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191; Phelan v Middle States Oil Corp (1955) 220 F 2d 593; Pilmer and Ors v Duke Group Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 165; Prince Jeffri Bolkiah v KPMG (A firm) (1999) 2 WLR 21; Re Demagogue Pty Limited v Ramensky (1992) 110 ALR 608; (1992) 39 FCR 31; Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134; The Marriage of Griffis (1991) 105 FLR 441; Tyrell v Bank of London and Ors (1862) 10 HLC 26; Warman International Limited & Anor v Dwyer & Ors (1995) 182 CLR 544; Wendt v Northwood [2003] NSWSC 546 PARTIES : Roy Wendt - Plaintiff Kenneth Edward Northwood - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20172/2000 COUNSEL : W. Haffenden with S. Bensen - Plaintiff D. Williams - Defendant SOLICITORS : Kenneally & Co Solicitors - Plaintiff Acuiti Legal Solicitors - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate