NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Stockl v Rigura Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 73 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 & 5 February, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Palmer J at 3 DECISION : (1) Leave to amend Notice of Appeal refused; (2) appeal dismissed; (3) parties to file written submissions as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - MORTGAGE - POWER OF SALE - Whether mortgagee's power of sale had been exercised in good faith - significance of expert valuation evidence as to market price of property - significance of result of properly conducted advertising campaign - whether unaccepted offer for property may be taken into consideration in determining whether sale at an undervalue - whether it is proper for a mortgagee to advertise a sale as a "mortgagee sale" - whether a mortgagee must obtain an independent valuation of the property before setting a reserve price or accepting an offer to buy - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Whether case should be remitted to trial judge to enable a finding as to disputed fact to be made - whether cause of action should be remitted if doomed to failure in any event. LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) - s.57(2) - Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Bangadilly Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1978) 139 CLR 195 - Marcus Clark & Co Ltd v Commissioner for Railways (1949) 29 VLR 98 - Elizabeth Grove Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (unrep. FCA 22 June 1994 - Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd [2001] FCA 1059 - Goold & Rootsey v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 42 FCR 51 - Hallifax Property Corp Pty Ltd v GIFC Ltd (1987) 4 BPR 9708 - Hawkesbury Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (1994) 8 BPR 15,581 CASES CITED : - Henry Roach (Petroleum) Pty Ltd v Credit House (Victoria) Pty Ltd [1976] VR 309 - McDonald v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1915) 20 CLR 231 - Pendlebury v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1912) 13 CLR 676 - Stone v. Farrow Mortgage Services (In liq) [2000] ANZ ConvR 463 - Tyler v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (In liq) [2001] QSC 495 - Warner v Jacob (1882) 20 Ch D 220 - Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd v Kingsland (1991) 26 NSWLR 700 - Westpac Corporation v Lakajev [2000] NSWSC 603 Peter Maximilian Stockl - Appellant Rigura Pty Ltd - First Respondent Thomas George Ridgeway & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Second Respondent Christopher Michael Finn & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Third Respondent John Barry Gray & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Fourth Respondent PARTIES : David Lee Bitel & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Fifth Respondent Phillip John Lederman & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Sixth Respondent Laurence Phillip Graves & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Seventh Respondent Malcolm Phillip Bersten & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Eighth Respondent Rodney Kent & Ors t/as Parish Patience Solicitors - Ninth Respondent Adolfson Investments Pty Ltd - Tenth Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40695/02 COUNSEL : J. Thomson and S.W. Davis - Appellant J.T. Gleeson SC and R.A. O'Keefe - Respondents SOLICITORS : L.C. Muriniti & Associates - Appellant Minter Ellison - Respondents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate