NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Penrith Rugby League Club Ltd v Brown [2004] NSWSC 1182 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/11/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq DECISION : Balance of proceedings dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE [23]- Amending Bill before Parliament- Inadmissible as to meaning of current legislation. EVIDENCE [65]- Privilege- Communications within Department. PROCEDURE [429]- Discovery- Notice to party to produce documents- What specificity required- Supreme Court Rules Pt 23(2). LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, s 130 Supreme Court Rules Pt 23(2) Alister v The Queen (1984) 151 CLR 404 Commonwealth v Northern Land Council (1993) 176 CLR 604 Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 CASES CITED : Khanna v Lovell White Durant [1995] 1 WLR 121 Kursell v Timber Operators & Contractors Ltd [1927] 1 KB 298 Papadopoulos v Goodwin [1982] 1 NSWLR 413 Re Arthur Stanley Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 Penrith Rugby League Club Ltd (P1) Penrith District Rugby League Football Club Ltd (P2) PARTIES : Kenneth Maxwell Brown (D1) Ian Douglas Temby (D2) Roger Maxwell Cowan (D3) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4553/04 COUNSEL : B A Coles QC and T Lynch (P) P Singleton and Ms D Robinson (D1 & 2) SOLICITORS : Back Schwartz Vaughan (P) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor, (D1 & 2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate