NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 211 FLR 281
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Ronen & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1285 HEARING DATE(S) : JUDGMENT DATE : 15 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1 DECISION : The applications are dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Indictiment - bad for duplicity - oppressive - Conspiracy to defraud - nature of charge - Deprivation or imperilment - two charges? - Crimes Act (Cth) s 29D and s 86(2) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1914 Petroulias v Wills NSWSC 1190 per Simpson J Wills v Petroulias [2003] NSWCA 390 Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467 S v Regina (1989) 168 CLR 266 King v Regina (1986) 161 CLR 423 Saffron (1989) 17 NSWLR 395 Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 CASES CITED : The Law of Criminal Conspiracy by Peter Gillies 2nd Edition 1990 at p 216 Gerakiteys v The Queen (1983) 153 CLR 317 Griffiths (1966) 1 QB 589 Mok (1987) 27 A Crim R 438 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493 R v Ghosh (1982) QB 1053 Spies v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 603 at 603.1 R v Iannelli (2003) 56 NSWLR 247 R v Scott (1975) AC 819 Caratti v R (2000) WASCA 279 Regina v Ida Ronen PARTIES : Regina v Nitzan Ronen Regina v Izhar Ronen FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70222/03; 70032/03; 70223/03 Mr T. Game SC; Ms S, McNaughton - Crown COUNSEL : Mr R. Richter QC; Mr N. Rosenbaum - Accused Ida Ronen Mr I. Hill QC; Mr E. Power - Accused Nitzan Ronen Mr. R. Van de Wiel QC; Mr P. Jones - Accused Izhar Ronen SOLICITORS : Ms P. Musgrave - Cth DPP Watsons Solicitors - Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate