NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Taylor v Chapman & Anor [2003] NSWSC 992 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 November 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is upheld; (2) This matter is remitted to the Tribunal Member to be determined according to law; (3) The defendants are to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the summons as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of CTTT - contract - frustration LEGISLATION CITED : Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 - s 63(3) Home Building Act 1989 Carmichael v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (1994) 44 SR(NSW) 233 Codelfa Constructions Pty Limited v State Rail Authority (1982) 149 CLR 337 Davis Contractors Limited v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696 Joseph Constantine Steamship Line Ltd v Imperial Smelting Corporation Ltd [1942] AC 154 Lobb v Vasey Housing Auxiliary (War Widows Guild) [1963] VR 239 CASES CITED : Scanlan's New Neon Ltd v Tooheys Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 169 Simmons Ltd v Hay (1964-5) NSWR 416 Taskiroglou v Noblee Thorl GMBH [1962] AC 93 The Civil Servant Two [1990] Vol 1 1 LILR 1 Universal Cargo Carriers Corporation v Citati [1957] s QB 401 Whim Well Copper Mines Ltd v Pratt (1910) 12 WALR 166 Ernest & Fredericka Taylor (Plaintiffs)
PARTIES : David Chapman (First Defendant)
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Australia Limited (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12971/2002 Mr B A Coles QC with Mr G B Carolan
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate