NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 149 A Crim R 505
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Trevenna [2004] NSWCCA 43 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; James J at 86; Barr J at 97 DECISION : 1. Crown appeal to increase sentence dismissed; 2. (by majority) Respondent's appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : SENTENCE - Crown appeal to increase sentence - Whether sentence manifestly inadequate - plea of manslaughter accepted - s421 Crimes Amendment (Self Defence) Act 2001 (NSW) unreasonable response in the way force used to inflict death - imminent threat to life from the deceased - Respondent's appeal against sentence - range of like-offence sentences considered - whether sufficient range. Crimes Act 1900 s19A; s24; s316; s418; s421 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Amendment (Self Defence) Act 2001 (NSW) Pt 11, Div 3 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s5D Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Azar (1991) 56 A Crim R 414 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Blacklidge (CCA, unreported, 12 December 1995) R v Cioban [2003] NSWCCA 304 (21 October 2003) R v Cioban [2002] NSWSC 972 R v Duke [2000] SASC 254 R v Gazdovic [2002] VSC 588 R v Grenenger [1999] NSWSC 380 R v Hungerford (NSWCCA 15 December 1993) R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Mills (NSWCCA, 3 April 1995) CASES CITED : R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Nguyen [2002] NSWSC 536 R v O'Donnell [2002] SASC 183 R v Salaman (NSWCCA, 9 June 1994) R v Scott [2003] NSWSC 627 R v Schelberger (Court of Criminal Appeal, 2 June 1988, unreported) R v Sofokleous (NSWCCA 13 December 1993, unreported) R v Speechley (2002) 133 A Crim R 26 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Trevenna [2003] NSWSC 463 R v Turkman (2002) 133 A Crim R 328 R v Viro (1978) 141 CLR 88 Wilson v The Queen (1991-1992) 174 CLR 313 Wong v the Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Zecevic v DPP (Vic) (1987) 162 CLR 645 PARTIES : Regina (Appellant/ Crown) Leeanne TREVENNA aka Harris (Respondent/ Cross-Applicant) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60232/03; 60462/03 COUNSEL : R D Cogswell, SC/ D J Thiering (Appellant/ Crown) I H McClintock, SC (Respondent/ Cross-Applicant) SOLICITORS : C K Smith (Appellant/ Crown) S O'Connor (Respondent/Cross-Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate