NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 211 FLR 268
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Ronen & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1284 HEARING DATE(S) : JUDGMENT DATE : 15 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1 DECISION : In my view, it is in the interests of justice that the witness give the evidence for the reasons I have stated in this decision.
CATCHWORDS : Evidence Act (NSW) s 128(5) - witness required to give evidence - privilege in respect of self-incrimination - tax agents and disciplinary proceedings - Income Tax Regulations 1936 (Reg 168) Financial Transactions Reports Act 1992 Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : ITA Act 1936 Income Tax Regulations 1936 Commonwealth Evidence Act (Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) R v Collison (2003) NSWCCA 212 Police Service Board v Morris 156 CLR 397 at 404; 408 and 411 CASES CITED : Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW (1957) 97 CLR 279 at 286 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v Pangallo (1993) 67 A CrimR 77 Re; Maraj (a Legal Practitioner) (1995) 15 WAR 12 Commissioner of Taxation v De Vonk (1995) 61 FCR 564 Regina v Ida Ronen PARTIES : Regina v Nitzan Ronen Regina v Izhar Ronen FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70222/03; 70032/03; 70223/03 Mr T. Game SC; Ms S. McNaughton - Crown COUNSEL : Mr R. Richter QC; Mr N. Rosenbaum - Accused Ida Ronen Mr I. Hill QC; Mr E. Power - Accused Nitzan Ronen Mr R. Van de Wiel QC; Mr P. Jones - Accused Izhar Ronen SOLICITORS : Ms P. Musgrave - Cth DPP Watsons Solicitors - Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate