NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sande v Medsara Pty Limited (No 2) [2004] NSWSC 262 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/3/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ at 1 DECISION : Order that the defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceeding upon the indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - principle giving discretion to order indemnity costs on the basis of some relevant delinquency on the part of the unsuccessful party - high-handed or impudent reliance on defence known to be untrue - order made. Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd v De Jager [1984] VR 483 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Degmam Pty Ltd (In Liq.) v Wright (No.2) (unreported, Holland J, 11 October 1983) Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 CASES CITED : Harrison v Schipp [2001] NSWCA 13 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Packer v Meagher (1984) 3 NSWLR 486 Ragata Developments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corp (1993) BC 9304555 Re Smith; Ex parte Rundle (No. 2) (1991) 6 WAR 299 Joseph Sande and Diana Sande (first plaintiffs) Andrew Terides (second plaintiff) Esther El-Hage (third plaintiff) PARTIES : Tony Dbais (fourth plaintiff) Shane Hugh Mills (fifth plaintiff) James Moreland and Sara Wendy Moreland (sixth plaintiffs) Medsara Pty Limited (Plaintiff) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4098/03 COUNSEL : N C Hutley SC / M B Evans (Plaintiffs) G Curtin (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jacques (Plaintiffs) Kemp Strang (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate