NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Tozer [2003] NSWCCA 72 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 1; Shaw J at 51 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against sentence - two armed robberies - driving motor vehicle without consent - whether sentences excessive - application of Pearce v The Queen - consideration of parity - adequacy of discount for utilitarian features and remorse - necessity for R v Ellis allowance concerning sentence for earlier armed robbery. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act, ss 97(1), 154A Criminal Appeal Act, s 6(3) Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 CASES CITED : R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Winchester 58 A Crim R 345 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 PARTIES : Regina v James Reginald Tozer FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60360/02 COUNSEL : P.E. Ingram (Crown) G.A. Bashir (Applicant) SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor (Crown) D.J. Humphreys (Applicant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/0063 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Bellear DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60360/02
STUDDERT J SHAW J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate