NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 151 A Crim R 343 62 NSWLR 1
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Diez v DPP [2004] NSWCA 452 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Tobias JA at 64 DECISION : Appeal allowed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - cost orders against the Commonwealth - DPP obtained restraining order in respect of appellant's interests in property - appellant serving life sentence following conviction under s233B Customs Act 1901 (Cth) - court below made orders pursuant to ss48(3)(g) and 48(4) Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth) - whether recovery of costs under s101 Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth) excludes the Supreme Court's wider power to order costs against a party including the Commonwealth in applications within the ambit of s101 - scope of that ambit - whether s101 constitutes an exclusive cost recovery code against the Commonwealth for applications to exempt property from forfeiture or restraint under the Act - whether applications under the Act of that character are limited to applications described in s101(1)(a) - whether court's discretion to order costs against the Commonwealth is wholly dependent on applicant satisfying s101 and all its conditions Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s64; s79 LEGISLATION CITED : Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth) s30; s43; s48; s101 Supreme Court Act 1970 s76 Supreme Court Rules Part 52A r11 Bissett v Commonwealth DPP (SC(Vic), 24 February 1993, unreported) Commonwealth DPP v Adjornay [2000] NSWSC 76 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Moorebank Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 55 CASES CITED : DPP (Cth) v Chan (2001) 52 NSWLR 56 DPP (Cth) v Saxon (1992) 28 NSWLR 263 Finance Facilities Pty Limited v the Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1970-71) 127 CLR 106 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 PARTIES : Maximiliano DIEZ (Appellant) DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41084/03 COUNSEL : S J ODGERS, SC/ G JONES (Appellant) D J FAGAN, SC/T MUIR (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Freemans (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate