NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) ATPR (Digest) 46-247 (2004) Aust Contract Reports 90-195
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : TAMBREE v TRAVEL COMPENSATION FUND & ORS [2004] NSWCA 24 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Ipp JA at 157 DECISION : 1 Appeal and cross-appeal allowed; 2 Set aside that part of order 1 which refers to the fourth and fifth defendants and add the following order:; 1A In favour of the plaintiff against the fourth and fifth defendants in the sum of $13,320 together with interest on the said judgment sum in accordance with the Supreme Court Act and Rules from 20 September 1999 to 15 November 2002 in the sum of $4,216 being a total of $17,536; 3 The respondent Travel Compensation Fund to pay the appellant and cross-appellant their costs of the appeal and cross-appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so qualified; 4 Liberty to the appellant and cross-appellant within seven days to make application to vary costs order 4 made by Austin J.
CATCHWORDS : Travel Compensation Fund - accountant - auditor - misleading and deceptive conduct - s42 Fair Trading Act - whether breach of duty of care - whether fact that respondent continued unlicensed in business of travel agent severed chain of causation Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Travel Agents Act 1986 Argy v Blunts & Lane Cove Real Estate Pty Ltd (1990) 26 FCR 112 Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 191 Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare (1992) 176 CLR 408 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 Chester v Afshar [2003] QB 356 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Connor v Blacktown District Hospital (1971) 1 NSWLR 713 Environment Agency (formerly National Rivers Authority) v Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd [1999] 2 AC 22 Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 241 Gardam v George Wills & Co Ltd [No 1] (1988) 82 ALR 415 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 CASES CITED : Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kewside Pty Ltd v Warman International Ltd (1990) ASC 58821 Mahony v J Kruschich (Demolitions) Pty Ltd (1985) 156 CLR 522 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1 Millman v Rochester Railway Co 3 App Div 109; 39 NYS 274 (1896) Modbury Triangle v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254 Rahman v Arearose Ltd [2001] QB 351 Ruddock v Taylor (2003) NSWCA 262 The Saints Gallery Pty Ltd v Plummer (1988) 80 ALR 525 Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Robert Tambree t/as R Tambree & Associates - Appellant PARTIES : Travel Compensation Fund - First Respondent/First Cross Appellant Phillip Roseby t/as P J Roseby & Co - Fifth Respondent/Cross Appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41145/02 P Walsh - Appellant COUNSEL : N Francey - First Respondent/First Cross Respondent R Dubler - Fifth Respondent/Cross Appellant Burston Cole & Co - Appellant SOLICITORS : McCabe Terrill - First Respondent/First Cross Respondent Phillips Fox Lawyers - Fifth Respondent/Cross Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate