NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v RAZZAK [2004] NSWCCA 62 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; O'Keefe J at 87; Bell J at 88 DECISION : 1. Appeal against conviction dismissed.; 2. Leave to appeal against sentence granted.; 3. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Resemblance evidence - identification - other circumstantial evidence - video of accused said to be "re-enactment" of offence LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss113-116; 137. Alexander v The Queen (1980-1981) 145 CLR 395 Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50 Domican v The Queen (1991-1992) 173 CLR 555 CASES CITED : Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Mundarra Doolan Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pitkin v The Queen (1995) 69 ALJR 612 R v Coxon (2002) SASC 165 REGINA
PARTIES : v
BILAL RAZZAK FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60169 of 2003 P Boulten (Apellant) COUNSEL : E Wilkins (Crown)
Murphy's Lawyers (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/11/0377 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Hock DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 22 - [2004] NSWCCA 62 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60169 of 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate