NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Mark Anthony Cooney [2004] NSWCCA 255 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Hidden J at 2; Buddin J at 3 DECISION : Appeal against conviction in respect of count 1 allowed. Appellant's plea of guilty to that count set aside. Conviction and sentence quashed and a new trial ordered. Sentence in respect of count 2 quashed and remitted to the District Court for sentence.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - ongoing supply of amphetamines - appeal against conviction following plea of guilty. LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Histollo Pty Ltd v Director-General National Parks and Wildlife Service (1998) 45 NSWLR 661 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Jackson [2004] NSW CCA 110 CASES CITED : R v Leete (2001) 125 A Crim R 37 R v McLean (2001) 121 A Crim R 484 R v Pamplin [2001] NSWCCA 327 R v Toro-Martinez (2000) 114 A Crim R 533 PARTIES : Regina (Respondent) Mark Anthony Cooney (Appellant) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60138/04 COUNSEL : D Woodburne (Respondent) RJ Button (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Respondent) S O'Connor (Appellant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/61/0205 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Woods DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60138/04
SPIGELMAN CJ HIDDEN J BUDDIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate