NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Geraldine Ann Gurss v William Byron Findley and William Buys [2004] NSWSC 229 revised - 1/04/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/03/04, 16/03/04, 17/03/04, 18/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Pearlman AJ DECISION : Parties to bring in, within 21 days, short minutes of order to give effect to the judgment.
CATCHWORDS : Claim by de-facto wife - substantial estate - long and harmonious de-facto relationship - failure by deceased to make adequate provision for plaintiff - adequate and proper provision - principles to be applied - contribution by plaintiff to welfare of deceased and accumulation of his assets - right to reside - proper income for plaintiff - capital sum to meet extingencies of life. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 at 208 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co (1938) AC 463 at 478-479 Golosky v Golosky (Unreported Court of Appeal 5/10/93) CASES CITED : Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Fraser (1995) 36 NSWLR 24 at 46 Anasson v Phillips (Unreported Young J Supreme Court 4/3/88) Hertzberg v Hertzberg [2003] NSWCA 311 at para 28 Langtry v Campbell (Unreported Powell J Supreme Court 7/3/91) Luciano v Rosenblum (Unreported Powell J 24/7/85) PARTIES : Geraldine Ann Gurss v William Byron Findley and William Buys FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4733 / 2002 Plaintiff: Mr P Hallen SC & Mr D Charles COUNSEL : Defendant: Mr M Cashion SC & Mr J White Plaintiff: Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe SOLICITORS : Defendant: Kemp Strang
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate