NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 134 LGERA 407
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 56; Pearlman AJA at 62 DECISION : (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the verdict and judgment for the respondent and the order for costs made on 14 November 2003; (3) Verdict and judgment for the appellant; (4) Respondent pay the appellant's costs of the trial and the appeal, and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - tripping case - raised edge of driveway across footpath - obvious in daylight to pedestrian taking reasonable care for own safety - plaintiff tripped at night - evidence of street light across road - no evidence of state of illumination of driveway or that plaintiff could not or did not see it - defendant owed duty of care - correct question whether in breach of duty - action or inaction of reasonable council to be assessed on basis of pedestrians taking reasonable care for own safety - whether plaintiff had burden of proof that driveway not visible to such a pedestrian (yes) - whether other matters made it a hazard which, acting reasonably, the defendant should have rectified (no) - not shown defendant failed to act reasonably - negligence not established. D Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; Burwood Council v Byrnes [2002] NSWCA 343; Calfest v Tombleson [2003] NSWCA 210; Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389; Dunn v Star City Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 223; Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540; CASES CITED : Liftronic Pty Ltd v Unver (2001) 179 ALR 321; Newcastle City Council v Lindsay [2004] NSWCA 198; Parramatta City Council v Watkins [2001] NSWCA 364; Parsons v Randwick Municipal Council [2003] NSWCA 191; Richmond Valley Council v Standing (2002) 127 LGERA 237; Smith v The Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 337; Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317; Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40. PARTIES : Temora Shire Council - Appellant Yvonne Stein - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41125/03 COUNSEL : J E Marshall SC & P M Sibtain - Appellant M J Cranitch SC & M Inglis - Respondent SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox - Appellant Commins Hendricks - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate