NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ah-See [2004] NSWCCA 202 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1; Howie J at 2; Hislop J at 3 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Sentencing - Fernando principles - Protective custody - Sentence not manifestly excessive. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 - ss 60(1), 112(2), 546C Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - Pt 3, Div 6 R v Burchell (1987) 34 A Crim R 148 R v Coleman (1990) 47 A Crim R 307 R v Drew [2000] NSWCCA 384 R v Durocher-Yvon [2003] NSWCCA 299 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 CASES CITED : R v Mostyn [2004] NSWCCA 97 R v Newell [2004] NSWCCA 183 R v Newman [2004] NSWCCA 102 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Russell (1995) 84 A Crim R 386 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 PARTIES : Regina Douglas Keith Ah-See FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60070/04 COUNSEL : Ms E Wilkins - Crown Mr H Dhanji - Applicant SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) SE O'Connor - Legal Aid Commission (NSW)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/61/0037 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Woods ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60070/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate