NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 49 ACSR 403
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : McGrath & Ors v National Indemnity Company [2004] NSWSC 391 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/03/04, 12/03/04, 03/05/04, 04/05/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 May 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Corporations List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Leave to proceed granted. Order extending time for liqiuidators' application.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - voidable transactions - extension of time for liquidator to initiate challenge - particular party targetted - party domiciled in foreign country - need for party to be defendant and to be served - construction of s.588FF(3)(b) - conditions necessary for extension to be granted LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.5888FF(1), 5888FF(3)(b) Supreme Court Rules, Part 1 rule 8, Part 10 rules 2, 4 and 5, Part 20 rule 1 Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Laros (1987) 13 NSWLR 286 BP Australia Ltd v Brown (2003) 46 ACSR 677 BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt [1980] 1 NSWLR 497 CASES CITED : Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 Greig v Australian Building Pty Ltd (2003) 21 ACLC 1565 McGrath re HIH Insurance Ltd (2004) 22 ACLC 449 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd (2002) 43 ACSR 65 Staff Membranes Pty Ltd v Synflex Industries (International) Inc [1984] 2 NSWLR 116 Anthony Gregory McGrath and Alexander Robert Mackay Macintosh as the joint liquidators of the HIH Companies - First Plaintiffs HIH Insurance Limited (In Liquidation) - Second Plaintiff FAI Traders Insurance Company Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Third Plaintiff World Marine & General Insurances Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Fourth Plaintiff HIH Underwriting & Insurance (Australia) Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Fifth Plaintiff United Body Works (Qld) Limited (In Liquidation) - Sixth Plaintiff Lanlex No 65 Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Seventh Plaintiff FAI Leasing Finance Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Eighth Plaintiff FAI Insurances Limited (In Liquidation) - Ninth Plaintiff PARTIES : CIC Insurance Limited (In Liquidation) - Tenth Plaintiff FAI Investments Pty Ltd (In Liqiuidation) - Eleventh Plaintiff FAI General Insurance Company Ltd (In Liquidation) - Twelfth Plaintiff FAI Overseas Investments Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Thirteenth Plaintiff HIH Casualty & General Insurance Limited (In Liquidation) - Fourteenth Plaintiff HIH Overseas Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) - Fifteenth Plaintiff FAI Financial Services Limited (In Liquidation) - Sixteenth Plaintiff FAI Overseas Holdings Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Seventeenth Plaintiff FAI Reinsurances Pty Limited (In Liquidation) - Eighteenth Plaintiff HIH Underwriting And Agency Services Limited (In Liquidation) - Nineteenth Plaintiff National Indemnity Company - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1877/04 COUNSEL : Mr M B Oakes SC - Plaintiffs SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron - Plaintiffs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate