NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : McGuren v Simpson [2004] NSWSC 35 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 February 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The decision of Lulham LCM dated 28 May 2003 is affirmed; (2) The appeal is dismissed; (3) The amended summons filed 28 August 2003 is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of Local Court Magistrate - whether leave should be given to appeal interlocutory matter - s 54 Limitation Act - whether email constitutes written and signed acknowledgement for the purposes of s 54 Limitation Act Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Electronic Transaction Act 2000 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1978 (UK) LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 (NSW) - s 109 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - s 54 Local Court (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) - s 69 Supreme Court Rules - Part 51B r 5 Ballas v Tedesco 41 F Supp 2d (1999) 541 (US D.N.J.) Bucknell v The Commerical Banking Company of Sydney Limited (1937) 58 CLR 155 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 389 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Itek Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliott (2002) 54 NSWLR 207 CASES CITED : House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lockheed-Arabia v Owen [1993] 3 All ER 641 Ostabridge v Stafford [2001] NSWSC 131 Pirie v Saunders (1961) 104 CLR 149 Surrendra Overseas Limited v Government of Sri Lanka (The Apjakash) [1977] 2 All ER 481 Wilkens v Iowa Insurance Commissioner (1990) 457 NW 2d 1 (US) Kim McGuren (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Robert Simpson (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11462/2003 Mr J Gleeson SC with Mr C Magee COUNSEL : (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate