NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Colley [2003] NSWCCA 323 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 1; Barr J at 58; Whealy J at 59 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - possession of drug in quantity greater than traffickable quantity - issue at trial whether drug in appellant's possession otherwise than for supply - grounds of appeal not taken at trial - whether leave to rely upon grounds should be granted. Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act, s 29 Evidence Act, ss 80, 135, 136, 137 Dhanhoa v The Queen [2003] HCA 40 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 CASES CITED : R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v David & Gugea (unreported, NSWCCA, 10 October 1995) R v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174 R v Lam [2002] NSWCCA 377 PARTIES : Regina v Richard Edward Colley FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60213/03 COUNSEL : E. Wilkins (Crown) A. Cook (Appellant) SOLICITORS : C.K. Smith (Crown) B. Sandland (Appellant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/61/0017 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT McGuire DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60213/03
STUDDERT J BARR J WHEALY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate