NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ACD Tridon Inc v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd & 2 Ors [2003] NSWSC 1014 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 October 2003; 16 October 2003; 17 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2003 JURISDICTION: Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ at 1 DECISION : Leave to appeal is refused. Order that ACDT pay the costs of TAPL and TNZL on a party and party basis of the application for leave to appeal. Strike out motion dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Commercial Arbitration - Leave to appeal and alleged technical misconduct. LEGISLATION CITED : Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth) BP Refinery (Westernport) Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR 266 Carr v Berriman Pty Ltd (1959) 89 CLR 327 Interbulk v Aid Shipping 1984 2 Lloyd's Reports 66 Mitchell v Patten Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 212 CASES CITED : Overlook v Foxtel (2002) Aust Contracts Rep 90-143 at 67 Pacol Ltd v Joint Stock Company Rossakhar 2000 1 Lloyd's Reports 209 R v Peto 148 ER 577 Thiess Watkins White Constructions Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia, unrep NSWSC 1992 Upper Hunter 118 CLR 429 PARTIES : ACD Tridon Inc v Tridon Australia Pty Limited & 2 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50100/03 COUNSEL : (P) Mr T G R Parker (D) Mr Jacobs SC & Mr Bambagiotti SOLICITORS : (P) Allens Arthur Robinson (D) Cutler Hughes & Harris
- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES SYDNEY REGISTRY COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate