NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ernst v Mowbray [2004] NSWSC 1140 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/10/04 [then written submissions] JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq DECISION : Proceedings are dismissed with no order as to costs save that the existing orders for costs that have been made at interlocutory stages are to continue.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION [316]- Family Provision- Widow- 17 year marriage- Long period of separation- Section 86 deed executed- Widow's claim fails- Executors distributing estate to themselves without notice- Consequences. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Law Act (Comm) 1975, s 86 Family Provision Act 1982, s 7 Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 D'Albora v D'Albora [1999] NSWSC 468; BC 9902597 Dijkhuijs v Barclay (1988) 13 NSWLR 639 Easterbrook v Young (1977) 136 CLR 308 Guardian Trust & Executors Company of New Zealand Ltd v The Public Trustee of New Zealand [1942] AC 115 CASES CITED : O'Shaughnessy v Mantle (1986) 7 NSWLR 142 Re Clissold [1970] 2 NSWLR 619 Re Faulkner [1999] 2 Qd R 49 Re Gimblett [1960] NZLR 664 Re Simpson [1950] Ch 38 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Smith v Smith (1986) 161 CLR 217 PARTIES : Victoria Canning Ernst (P) Sharon Bernadette Mowbray and Grahame Peter Ernst (D) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3804/02 COUNSEL : J Wilson SC (P) P Livingstone (D) SOLICITORS : Holman Webb (P) Kerrisons The Law Firm (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate