NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Richard Kingsley Sheehan & Anor [2004] NSWSC 294 revised - 3/05/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J DECISION : Claim for client legal privelege upheld in part and overruled in part - other party given access in respect of which claim of privilege overruled.
CATCHWORDS : Procedure - evidence - subpoenas - too wide - lack of legitimate forensic purpose - client legal privilege - waiver - implied consent to disclosure - material directly relating to matters in issue in subsequent proceedings Contracts Review Act 1980 Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 ss 25, 26 SCR Pt 36 r 13 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 CASES CITED : Garratt's Pty Ltd v Thanga Thangathurai [2000] NSWSC 39 New South Wales Commissioner of Police v Tuxford [2002] NSWCA 139 Perpetual Trustees (WA) Pty Ltd v Equuscorp Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 925 Telstra Corporation v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 PARTIES : Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Richard Kingsley Sheehan & Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13593/01 P Dowdy - Plaintiff In person - First Defendant COUNSEL : M B Duncan - Second Defendant G Bartley P Griffin Heidtman & Co Lawyers - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : In person - First Defendant M B Duncan - Second Defendant Legal Aid Commission
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate