NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Town & Country Property Management Systems Pty Ltd & Anor v Elie Kaltoum & Ors [2003] NSWSC 813 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Re-opening refused
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - re-opening of decision by trial judge - when appropriate - decision made that defendant liable for breach of contract, and reference to Master to assess damages proposed in judgment already delivered - defendant alleges that recovery of damages would involve plaintiff recovering damages for loss of profits which could only have been earned in circumstances of plaintiff acting illegally - plaintiff also puts claim for loss of damages on alternative basis to loss of profits, namely loss of capital item - DAMAGES - general principles - recoverability of damages for breach of contract for loss of profits which could only have been earned by plaintiff acting in circumstances involving illegality LEGISLATION CITED : Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 1941 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No.2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Brownbill v Kenworth Truck Sales (NSW) Pty Ltd (1982) 59 FLR 56 Fitzgerald v FJ Leonhardt Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 215 Lee v McClellan (1995) 127 FLR 383 CASES CITED : Smith's Newspapers Limited v Becker (1932) 47 CLR 279 State Rail Authority v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (No.2) (1982) 150 CLR 29 Wentworth v Rogers [2002] NSWSC 921 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (No.2) (1982) 149 CLR 672 Yango Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v First Chicago Australia Ltd (1978) 139 CLR 410 Town & Country Property Management Services Pty Limited - First Plaintiff/Respondent PFD Asset & Property Management Pty Ltd - Second Plaintiff PARTIES : Elie Kaltoum - First Defendant/Applicant Sandy-Real Estate Pty Ltd T/as Town & Country Real Estate Merrylands - Second Defendant MKR Holdings Pty Ltd - Third Defendant Matthew Karl Francis Robinson - Fourth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3625/99 COUNSEL : S Reuben - Plaintiff/Respondent RS Angyal - Defendants/Applicant SOLICITORS : Sid Hawach & Associates - Plaintiff/Respondent Lincoln Smith & Company - Defendants/Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate