NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 49 ACSR 45
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bibby Financial Services v Wolf Industries [2004] NSWSC 134 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Order made for substitution of applicant for winding up
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - application to wind up in insolvency - application by person who has served a statutory demand that has not been satisfied or set aside, for substitution as applicant for winding up - whether defendant may challenge applicant's standing as a creditor on ground that there is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459C, 459P, 459S, 465B Braams Group Pty Ltd v Miric (2002) 44 ACSR 124 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Paliflex (1995) 17 ACLC 467 David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 CASES CITED : House of Tan Pty Ltd v Beachiris Pty Ltd (1996) 21 ACSR 527 Re Calsil Ltd (1982) 6 ACLR 515 South East Water Ltd v Kitoria Pty Ltd (1996) 21 ACSR 465 Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 661 Bibby Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd (P) PARTIES : Scottish Pacific Business Finance Pty Ltd (A) Wolf Industries Australia Pty Ltd (D/R) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5926/03 COUNSEL : Mr F Gleeson (A) Mr S A Benson (D/R) SOLICITORS : Piper Alderman (A) Judd Commercial Lawyers as agent for Morgan Conley Solicitors (D/R)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate