NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions P/L & Anor [2004] NSWCA 449 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Santow JA at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed. Appellant to pay costs of the appeal of both respondents.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - the appellant claimed damages for back injuries allegedly suffered in two separate incidents with successive employers - extent of duty of employer to provide a safe system of work and equipment - extent of duty of employer to make inquiries as to employee's health - extent of duty of employer which knows or ought to know of particular susceptibility of employee - breach of duty - whether system of work unreasonably exposed appellant to a reasonably foreseeable risk of injury - whether system of work inherently unsafe. - EVIDENCE - burden of proof - proof of negligence - sufficiency of evidence - whether common sense requires a finding of negligence - findings of fact based on credibility of appellant. - PROCEDURE - Appeal and new trial - Adequacy of reasons - extent of duty of trial judge to give reasons - circumstances in which new trial required. LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 s151G-H Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Bailey (by his next friend Bergin) v Baltoro Holdings Pty Ltd (WASC Full Court, 25 September 1998, unreported) Bankstown Foundry Ltd v Braistina (1986) 160 CLR 301 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Blackman v Commonwealth (1978) 20 ACTR 33 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Finn v The Roman Catholic Trust Corporation for the Diocese of Townsville [1997] 1 Qd R 29 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Neill v NSW Fresh Food and Ice Pty Ltd (1962) 108 CLR 362 CASES CITED : NSW Land & Housing Corporation v Watkins (2002) Aust Torts R 81-641 Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Pettit v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Pitsiavas v John Lysaght (Aust) Pty Ltd [1962] NSWR 1500 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Shorey v PT Ltd (2003) 77 ALJR 1104 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Withers v Perry Chain Co Ltd [1961] 1 WLR 1314 Uehlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Pty Ltd (1963) 80 WN (NSW) 1600 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Zhang v Andrew Pine Furniture Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 250 Paul STOKER (Appellant) PARTIES : ADECCO GEMVALE CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD (First Respondent) ALLMEN INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (Second Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41175/03 D T KENNEDY, SC/ D E ANDREWS (Appellant) COUNSEL : D P M O'DOWD (First Respondent) D G T NOCK, SC/ W P Y AUSTRON (Second Respondent) Rishworth Dodd & Co (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Gillis, Delaney, Brown (First Respondent) Leigh Virtue & Associates (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate