NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Yeung LO Regina v Hui OUYANG [2004] NSWCCA 382 revised - 5/11/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 November 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Buddin J at 27; Smart AJ at 28 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - Crown appeal on ground sentences manifestly inadequate - order that sentences be served by home detention - respondents husband and wife - two infant children - no relatives in Australia - hardship on children justified order - outweighed need for deterrence. D R v Cappadona (2001) 122 A Crim R 52; R v Caradonna (2000) 118 A Crim R 312; R v Day (1998) 100 A Crim R 275 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510; CASES CITED : R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170; R v Jurisic (1988) 45 NSWLR 209; R v Purdon (CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported); R v Maslen (1995) 79 A Crim R 119; R v Wright (1994) 74 A Crim R 152; R v Tiki (CCA, 24 August 1994, unreported); PARTIES : Regina v Yeung LO Regina v Hui OUYANG FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1800; 2004/1803 COUNSEL : M Bracks - Applicant E L Fullerton SC & D Joan - Respondents SOLICITORS : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Applicant Robert Yip & Co - Respondents
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 04/11/0033 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Goldring DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 2004/1800 CA 2004/1803 DC 04/11/0033
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate